It quite aptly analogizes to the Nyquist frequencyfN, which is the highest [max frequency component] a signal can have before you lose the ability to uniquely infer its components from a given sample rate fs.
Also, I’m renaming it “Vingean disambiguation-limit”.[1]
P.S. fN=fs2, which means that you can only disambiguate signals whose max components are below half your sample rate. Above that point, and you start having ambiguities (aliases).
The “disambiguation limit” class has two members now. The inverse is the “disambiguation threshold”, which is the measure of power you require of your sampler/measuring-device in order to disambiguate between things-measured above a given measure.
...stating things as generally as feasible helps wrt finding metaphors. Hence the word-salad above. ^^′
re the Vingean deference-limit thing above:
It quite aptly analogizes to the Nyquist frequency fN, which is the highest [max frequency component] a signal can have before you lose the ability to uniquely infer its components from a given sample rate fs.
Also, I’m renaming it “Vingean disambiguation-limit”.[1]
P.S. fN=fs2, which means that you can only disambiguate signals whose max components are below half your sample rate. Above that point, and you start having ambiguities (aliases).
The “disambiguation limit” class has two members now. The inverse is the “disambiguation threshold”, which is the measure of power you require of your sampler/measuring-device in order to disambiguate between things-measured above a given measure.
...stating things as generally as feasible helps wrt finding metaphors. Hence the word-salad above. ^^′