High decoupling is what Harris is doing in that debate. What he is doing is wrong. Therefore high decoupling is wrong (or at least unreliable).
Upvoted for going all-in on a low-decoupling norm—I can’t tell whether that was intentionally funny or you’re genuinely living life by low-decoupling norms.
(Either way I think you’re passing the ITT for low-decoupling, so thanks.)
If you think there is something funny about low decoupling, then you’re probably strawmanning it. Or maybe it was a straw man all along, and I’m erroneously using that term to refer to something real.
or you’re genuinely living life by low-decoupling norms.
I can’t say that I do. But I try to. Because high decoupling leads to being wrong.
Upvoted for going all-in on a low-decoupling norm—I can’t tell whether that was intentionally funny or you’re genuinely living life by low-decoupling norms.
(Either way I think you’re passing the ITT for low-decoupling, so thanks.)
If you think there is something funny about low decoupling, then you’re probably strawmanning it. Or maybe it was a straw man all along, and I’m erroneously using that term to refer to something real.
I can’t say that I do. But I try to. Because high decoupling leads to being wrong.