Y said “X is crappy”.
This fact would, in general, cause me to update my beliefs about X and Y. Where’s the fallacy in that?
Are you just trying to make the distinction between inferences about the statement’s speaker the statement’s referents?
Y said “X is crappy”.
This fact would, in general, cause me to update my beliefs about X and Y. Where’s the fallacy in that?
Are you just trying to make the distinction between inferences about the statement’s speaker the statement’s referents?