For two of the examples you linked to this is contradicted by the person’s own account.
Their behavior during this period suggests otherwise.
Here’s a clue for you: people lie, especially these kinds of publicity hounds are notorious for rewriting their past if it will give them current publicity.
Here’s a clue for you: people lie, especially these kinds of publicity hounds are notorious for rewriting their past if it will give them current publicity.
I don’t see the relevance of the linked article. In this case, a better analogy to your argument is “we have evidence of him attempting sabotage, but he says he isn’t a traitor so he can’t be a traitor”.
Kthxbye.
Well, if you insist on trying to pass non sequiturs off as arguments, goodby.
Plus 3 gratituitous downvotes on unrelated comments of mine.
What, the nonsense you wrote about how priors work in the Pre-history thread. Seriously, if you don’t want to get downvoted, stop writing nonsense. Otherwise, don’t complain when you are downvoted.
Their behavior during this period suggests otherwise.
Here’s a clue for you: people lie, especially these kinds of publicity hounds are notorious for rewriting their past if it will give them current publicity.
And the absence of sabotage proves the existence of a fifth column. Kthxbye.
I don’t see the relevance of the linked article. In this case, a better analogy to your argument is “we have evidence of him attempting sabotage, but he says he isn’t a traitor so he can’t be a traitor”.
Well, if you insist on trying to pass non sequiturs off as arguments, goodby.
Plus 3 gratituitous downvotes on unrelated comments of mine. Ptui.
What, the nonsense you wrote about how priors work in the Pre-history thread. Seriously, if you don’t want to get downvoted, stop writing nonsense. Otherwise, don’t complain when you are downvoted.