Huh, 120 is correct! I didn’t realise it was googleable. I guess I should have actually checked that and picked a different similar sequence (like umm 30, 33, 36, 39, 41, 45, 50, 55, 63, 113 a lot of these seem to be googleable now and this one is arguably harder)--woops.
It hadn’t occurred to me to google for it. But now I remember about the OEIS. (“svsgrra va onfr svsgrra zvahf a”? I would never have thought of that myself!)
(Edited to rot-13 spoiler—sorry if anybody read it first.)
Off Topic
damn that 30, i can’t think of any valid hypothesis that includes that.
Did you Google it? Google seems to have the sequence. It suggests that one possible answer is 120!
Nah, where’s the fun in that? ;)
Huh, 120 is correct! I didn’t realise it was googleable. I guess I should have actually checked that and picked a different similar sequence (like umm 30, 33, 36, 39, 41, 45, 50, 55, 63, 113 a lot of these seem to be googleable now and this one is arguably harder)--woops.
It hadn’t occurred to me to google for it. But now I remember about the OEIS. (“svsgrra va onfr svsgrra zvahf a”? I would never have thought of that myself!)
(Edited to rot-13 spoiler—sorry if anybody read it first.)