Bret’s thesis rests on two pillars: the mRNA vaccines are dangerous and Ivermectin is a safer alternative. If either of these aren’t true, then vaccination is the better option.
According to Yuri, basically all of the important claims are false. Neither pillar holds. The case on Dark Horse for the dangers of the vaccine and the safety and efficacy of Ivermectin is misleading at best. It requires cherry-picking studies of poor quality, and then misrepresenting what they actually say. Unless Yuri is outright making stuff up, I don’t know what Bret is thinking. My estimation that Bret is being either rational or honest is diminishing.
I mentioned previously of conspiracy theorists that
They don’t notice the inconsistencies in their own models, and their bald assertions often don’t stand up to easy verification, if you bother to check.
Both Bret and Steve seem to show this failing now, and despite Bret’s earlier record of scientific thinking and correct contrarianism, I think he’s out of touch.
Yuri Deigin recently did a point-by-point takedown on Rebel Wisdom: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwzfnZfo-rU
Bret’s thesis rests on two pillars: the mRNA vaccines are dangerous and Ivermectin is a safer alternative. If either of these aren’t true, then vaccination is the better option.
According to Yuri, basically all of the important claims are false. Neither pillar holds. The case on Dark Horse for the dangers of the vaccine and the safety and efficacy of Ivermectin is misleading at best. It requires cherry-picking studies of poor quality, and then misrepresenting what they actually say. Unless Yuri is outright making stuff up, I don’t know what Bret is thinking. My estimation that Bret is being either rational or honest is diminishing.
I mentioned previously of conspiracy theorists that
Both Bret and Steve seem to show this failing now, and despite Bret’s earlier record of scientific thinking and correct contrarianism, I think he’s out of touch.