For example, if there’s no post-rational stage of developement, what use is the advice of not confusing it with a pre-rational stage of developement?
It’s quite different when CFAR tells you to listen to your emotions via focusing when facing a tough decision then when a random celebrity tells a person to listen to their emotions when facing a tough decision.
CFAR’s position would be “post-rational” in Wilber’s terminology while the random celebrity would be pre-rational (CFAR is a yellow place and not a orange one).
Is it really quite different, besides halo effect? It strongly depends on the detail, though if the two say the exact same thing, how are things different?
It’s quite different when CFAR tells you to listen to your emotions via focusing when facing a tough decision then when a random celebrity tells a person to listen to their emotions when facing a tough decision.
CFAR’s position would be “post-rational” in Wilber’s terminology while the random celebrity would be pre-rational (CFAR is a yellow place and not a orange one).
Is it really quite different, besides halo effect? It strongly depends on the detail, though if the two say the exact same thing, how are things different?
1) The audience. 2) The presentation.