I think he might be simplifying it a little bit. As I understand QM, it’s more like probability with complex numbers, rather than with negative numbers.
The book is cleaned up and updated. There’s a section at the beginning explaining all the new results that have come out since 2006, requiring updates to the lecture notes when he was turning them into a book.
I think he might be simplifying it a little bit. As I understand QM, it’s more like probability with complex numbers, rather than with negative numbers.
Yes, he is. Must be for rhetorical purposes, because elsewhere he says exactly that.
I think it’s been up for a long time on his website as a lecture series. http://www.scottaaronson.com/democritus/
I think he might be simplifying it a little bit. As I understand QM, it’s more like probability with complex numbers, rather than with negative numbers.
The book is cleaned up and updated. There’s a section at the beginning explaining all the new results that have come out since 2006, requiring updates to the lecture notes when he was turning them into a book.
Yes, he is. Must be for rhetorical purposes, because elsewhere he says exactly that.
Ah, okay. It’s been a while since I read it. I remember it being excellent though.