In many of your prior posts where you bring up MWI, your interpretation doesn’t fundamentally matter to the overall point you’re trying to make in that post; that is, your overall conclusion for that post held or failed regardless of which interpretation is correct, possibly to a greater degree than you tend to realize.
For example: “We used a true randomness source—a quantum device.” The philosophers’ point could equally have been made by choosing the first 2^N digits of pi and finding they correspond by chance to someone’s GLUT.
In many of your prior posts where you bring up MWI, your interpretation doesn’t fundamentally matter to the overall point you’re trying to make in that post; that is, your overall conclusion for that post held or failed regardless of which interpretation is correct, possibly to a greater degree than you tend to realize.
For example: “We used a true randomness source—a quantum device.” The philosophers’ point could equally have been made by choosing the first 2^N digits of pi and finding they correspond by chance to someone’s GLUT.