Upon further thought, the real reason that I reject Person 1′s argument is because everything should add up to normality, whereas Person 1′s conclusion is ridiculous at face value, and not in a “that seems like a paradox” way, more of a “who is this lunatic talking to me” way.
Upon further thought, the real reason that I reject Person 1′s argument is because everything should add up to normality, whereas Person 1′s conclusion is ridiculous at face value, and not in a “that seems like a paradox” way, more of a “who is this lunatic talking to me” way.