Yes, our current god-shatter-derived inconsistent values can not be described by a utility function, even as an abstraction.
Actually, yes they can. Any computable agent’s values can be represented by a utility function. That’s one of the good things about modelling using utility functions—they can represent any agent. For details, see here:
Any agent can be expressed as an O-maximizer (as we show in Section 3.1)
Actually, yes they can. Any computable agent’s values can be represented by a utility function. That’s one of the good things about modelling using utility functions—they can represent any agent. For details, see here: