Indeed. This danger is frequently top of mind, that we may well disrupt or cripple AI’s mundane utility while not doing anything to prevent it from killing everyone, in remarkably similar fashion to how we treated fission and fusion
Is that what happened? Nuclear nonproliferation efforts have been much more successful than I would have expected by default. The best of both worlds is of course clean energy + nuclear nonproliferation, and I think that’s an achievable world, but would you actually prefer the fully civilian energy outcome over the alternative?
Is that what happened? Nuclear nonproliferation efforts have been much more successful than I would have expected by default. The best of both worlds is of course clean energy + nuclear nonproliferation, and I think that’s an achievable world, but would you actually prefer the fully civilian energy outcome over the alternative?