rationalists as people who make optimal plays versus rationalists as people who love truth and hate lies
It’s only possible for us to systematically make optimal plays IF we have a sufficient grasp of truth. There’s only an equivocation in the minds of people who don’t understand that one goal is a necessary precursor for the other.
No, I think there is an equivocation here, though that’s probably because of the term “people who love truth and hate lies” instead of “epistemic rationalist”.
An epistemic rationalist wants to know truth and to eliminate lies from their mind. An instrumental rationalist wants to win, and one precursor to winning is to know truth and to eliminate lies from one’s own mind.
However, someone who “loves truth and hates lies” doesn’t merely want their own mind to filled with truth. They want for all minds in the universe to be filled with truth and for lies to be eliminated from all minds. This can be an impediment to “winning” if there are competing minds.
No, I think there is an equivocation here, though that’s probably because of the term “people who love truth and hate lies” instead of “epistemic rationalist”.
An epistemic rationalist wants to know truth and to eliminate lies from their mind. An instrumental rationalist wants to win, and one precursor to winning is to know truth and to eliminate lies from one’s own mind.
However, someone who “loves truth and hates lies” doesn’t merely want their own mind to filled with truth. They want for all minds in the universe to be filled with truth and for lies to be eliminated from all minds. This can be an impediment to “winning” if there are competing minds.