Does it really show that? Looks hoplessly confounded to me:
Among fully vaccinated persons, 93 of 122 (76%) Pfizer-BioNTech recipients and 0 of 50 (0%) Moderna recipients had been vaccinated ≥4 months before the outbreak (p<0.001). A larger proportion of Pfizer-BioNTech recipients had diabetes (p = 0.02) or hypertension (p<0.001) than Moderna or Janssen COVID-19 vaccine recipients, and a higher proportion of Pfizer-BioNTech and Janssen recipients had a history of smoking (p<0.001) than Moderna recipients
This sounds like serious confounding. In all likelihood, prison docs had X doses and triaged, and then repeated.
I will say though—I do still think Moderna primary was likely better, but I’ve (since writing) found out that the booster is half the dose of the primary dose—so I doubt Moderna’s increased efficacy translates to the booster.
Does it really show that? Looks hoplessly confounded to me:
This sounds like serious confounding. In all likelihood, prison docs had X doses and triaged, and then repeated.
I will say though—I do still think Moderna primary was likely better, but I’ve (since writing) found out that the booster is half the dose of the primary dose—so I doubt Moderna’s increased efficacy translates to the booster.