Yeah, on going back and reading the transcript, I think I was just misinterpreting what you were talking about. I agree with what you were trying to illustrate to Lucas.
(Though I still don’t think the is-ought distinction is a perfect analogy. This manifests in me also not thinking that the notion of “ought facts” would make it into a later draft of your assumption example—though on the other hand, talking about ought facts makes more sense when you’re trying to find a utility function type object, which [shock] is what you were talking about at that point in the podcast.)
Yeah, on going back and reading the transcript, I think I was just misinterpreting what you were talking about. I agree with what you were trying to illustrate to Lucas.
(Though I still don’t think the is-ought distinction is a perfect analogy. This manifests in me also not thinking that the notion of “ought facts” would make it into a later draft of your assumption example—though on the other hand, talking about ought facts makes more sense when you’re trying to find a utility function type object, which [shock] is what you were talking about at that point in the podcast.)