The main flaw in both arguments is the implication that “freedom” is a scalar and is terminally valuable to everyone. There’s lots of dimensionality to one’s ability to choose various options, which prevents a meaningful comparison.
There’s no disagreement over what each is allowed to do, the disagreement is over the value to each of those choices. And it’s not much disagreement.
The main flaw in both arguments is the implication that “freedom” is a scalar and is terminally valuable to everyone. There’s lots of dimensionality to one’s ability to choose various options, which prevents a meaningful comparison.
There’s no disagreement over what each is allowed to do, the disagreement is over the value to each of those choices. And it’s not much disagreement.