I am puzzled about how you can declare progressive thought un consequnetialist without specifying a version of consequnetialism. For instance , it would not be difficult to make a consequential argument about the rich paying too little tax, and the poor too much. It is also not clear why the alternatives to progressivism fare better.
I am puzzled about how you can declare progressive thought un consequnetialist without specifying a version of consequnetialism. For instance , it would not be difficult to make a consequential argument about the rich paying too little tax, and the poor too much. It is also not clear why the alternatives to progressivism fare better.