How about Stuart_Armstrong’s response to satt’s comment? It looks to me like Stuart agrees there was ambiguity there.
(And, to be clear, by “ambiguity there” I am using ambiguity as a one-place word by choosing the maximum of the two-place ambiguity among the actual readers of the post. Stuart has no ambiguity about what Stuart meant, but Steven does, and so the one-place ambiguity is Steven’s ambiguity.)
If you’d read my comment, it’s clear that I am objecting to your rhetoric. Only you can prevent the jump to the assumption that I have a dog in the fight.
Do you have an actual argument that there was ambiguity in Stuart’s post?
How about Stuart_Armstrong’s response to satt’s comment? It looks to me like Stuart agrees there was ambiguity there.
(And, to be clear, by “ambiguity there” I am using ambiguity as a one-place word by choosing the maximum of the two-place ambiguity among the actual readers of the post. Stuart has no ambiguity about what Stuart meant, but Steven does, and so the one-place ambiguity is Steven’s ambiguity.)
If you’d read my comment, it’s clear that I am objecting to your rhetoric. Only you can prevent the jump to the assumption that I have a dog in the fight.