I listened to it. I don’t recommend it. Anca seems good and reasonable but the conversation didn’t get into details on misalignment, scalable oversight, or DeepMind’s Frontier Safety Framework.
My read is that the target audience is much more about explaining alignment concerns to a mainstream audience and that GDM takes them seriously (which I think is great!), than about providing non trivial details to a LessWrong etc audience
I think the most interesting part was that she made a comment that one way to predict a mind is to be a mind, and that that mind will not necessarily have the best of all of humanity as its goal. So she seems to take inner misalignment seriously.
I listened to it. I don’t recommend it. Anca seems good and reasonable but the conversation didn’t get into details on misalignment, scalable oversight, or DeepMind’s Frontier Safety Framework.
My read is that the target audience is much more about explaining alignment concerns to a mainstream audience and that GDM takes them seriously (which I think is great!), than about providing non trivial details to a LessWrong etc audience
Agreed.
I think the most interesting part was that she made a comment that one way to predict a mind is to be a mind, and that that mind will not necessarily have the best of all of humanity as its goal. So she seems to take inner misalignment seriously.