Thanks! I think the reason I didn’t give those expressions is that they’re not very enlightening. See here for l = 2 on (0, 1⁄2] and here for l = 4 on [1/2, 1).
Ha! OK, that is indeed nasty. Yeah I guess CASes can solve this kind of problem these days, can’t they? Well—I say “these days” as if it this hasn’t been the case for, like, my entire life, I’ve just never gotten used to making routine use of them...
Thanks! I think the reason I didn’t give those expressions is that they’re not very enlightening. See here for l = 2 on (0, 1⁄2] and here for l = 4 on [1/2, 1).
Ha! OK, that is indeed nasty. Yeah I guess CASes can solve this kind of problem these days, can’t they? Well—I say “these days” as if it this hasn’t been the case for, like, my entire life, I’ve just never gotten used to making routine use of them...