Elizier- Even it’s unlikely that you could make the next proper update any time soon (let’s face it- that’s been established), maybe you could at least get another O-Make chapter up? A few more rationalist adaptations could be made more easily (as you or somebody else can just expose the character’s irrational actions in the same style) and would mean the fans weren’t kept waiting.
It’s been established that we don’t have the next “proper update” yet. Do you have extra private information that indicates that it won’t be soon, or are you abusing the word “established” grotesquely?
I would rather have the next “proper update” a bit sooner, than have it a bit later but have an extra chapter of omake first. I doubt that I am unique in this.
Eliezer has indicated (in author’s notes) that he thinks making him feel guilty about updating slowly will tend to make him update slower, rather than faster. This seems plausible to me (the relevant mental quirks being ones that I happen to share). If so, your comment seems obviously counterproductive.
Elizier- Even it’s unlikely that you could make the next proper update any time soon (let’s face it- that’s been established), maybe you could at least get another O-Make chapter up? A few more rationalist adaptations could be made more easily (as you or somebody else can just expose the character’s irrational actions in the same style) and would mean the fans weren’t kept waiting.
It’s been established that we don’t have the next “proper update” yet. Do you have extra private information that indicates that it won’t be soon, or are you abusing the word “established” grotesquely?
I would rather have the next “proper update” a bit sooner, than have it a bit later but have an extra chapter of omake first. I doubt that I am unique in this.
Eliezer has indicated (in author’s notes) that he thinks making him feel guilty about updating slowly will tend to make him update slower, rather than faster. This seems plausible to me (the relevant mental quirks being ones that I happen to share). If so, your comment seems obviously counterproductive.
His name is spelt “Eliezer”, not “Elizier”.