Or the opposite, allowing certain species to overpopulate
Why one species overpopulating is bad is because there is a decrease in biodiversity (more biomass in more monotonic makeup)
Was the first supposed to point to needless extinctions? Even there it might help to understand that if there is a balance of extinctions and speciation biodiversity can stay level.
I also thought that the “external” in “negative externalities” was that it was impacting parties to directly involved. So in that sense a “negative internality” would be if I hunt you down, I get to eat and fill my belly and you get to die and suffer pain. And when we make agrements they sometimes bind us in a bad way, it should be positive on the whole but there are individual parts that are not in the enthusitic interest of the party that it effects. With this “external to considerations” scope even “Unknown unknowns” would be externalities.
I go by the standard OED definition of biodiversity
biodiversity / ˌbʌɪə(ʊ)dʌɪˈvəːsɪti / ▸ noun [ mass noun ] the variety of plant and animal life in the world or in a particular habitat, a high level of which is usually considered to be important and desirable .
It was supposed to point to a decline in the variety of plant and animal life in the world or in a particular habitat, particularly those which are usually considered to be important and desirable .
Why one species overpopulating is bad is because there is a decrease in biodiversity (more biomass in more monotonic makeup)
Was the first supposed to point to needless extinctions? Even there it might help to understand that if there is a balance of extinctions and speciation biodiversity can stay level.
I also thought that the “external” in “negative externalities” was that it was impacting parties to directly involved. So in that sense a “negative internality” would be if I hunt you down, I get to eat and fill my belly and you get to die and suffer pain. And when we make agrements they sometimes bind us in a bad way, it should be positive on the whole but there are individual parts that are not in the enthusitic interest of the party that it effects. With this “external to considerations” scope even “Unknown unknowns” would be externalities.
I go by the standard OED definition of biodiversity
biodiversity / ˌbʌɪə(ʊ)dʌɪˈvəːsɪti / ▸ noun [ mass noun ] the variety of plant and animal life in the world or in a particular habitat, a high level of which is usually considered to be important and desirable .
It was supposed to point to a decline in the variety of plant and animal life in the world or in a particular habitat, particularly those which are usually considered to be important and desirable .