I’d go with the AI as a pos neg factor in global risk paper from 2006, it would be even better if distilled (even though it’s already around as indimidatingly-long as the resources you proposed).
But the elephant in the room for first-time explanation is that concepts have to be timed strategically to be mindful of the absurdity heuristic, not just vomited out in an order ultra-optimized for epistemic flow (like computer code) instead of the cultural mentality of the receiver.
This contest attempted to help with that by creating persuasive soundbytes, and there’s another one in the works for executive summaries. But ultimately I think that the lessons learned from talking to academics has the best insights on the big bottlenecks here.
I’d go with the AI as a pos neg factor in global risk paper from 2006, it would be even better if distilled (even though it’s already around as indimidatingly-long as the resources you proposed).
But the elephant in the room for first-time explanation is that concepts have to be timed strategically to be mindful of the absurdity heuristic, not just vomited out in an order ultra-optimized for epistemic flow (like computer code) instead of the cultural mentality of the receiver.
This contest attempted to help with that by creating persuasive soundbytes, and there’s another one in the works for executive summaries. But ultimately I think that the lessons learned from talking to academics has the best insights on the big bottlenecks here.