Not to be cynical, PhilGoetz, but isn’t Holden an important player in the rational-charity movement? Wouldn’t the ultimate costs of ignoring Holden be prohibitive?
That could explain the green dot. I don’t know which explanation is more depressing.
You are absolutely correct. And, that’s not the reason I find it engaging or informative.
Not to be cynical, PhilGoetz, but isn’t Holden an important player in the rational-charity movement? Wouldn’t the ultimate costs of ignoring Holden be prohibitive?
That could explain the green dot. I don’t know which explanation is more depressing.
You are absolutely correct. And, that’s not the reason I find it engaging or informative.