The particular example given (architecture) doesn’t really make sense IMO:
If you’re building something and want to save money on architecture, the current solution is to take a boilerplate design, tweak it to the current plot and local building code, and build it. Either AI can do that tweaking well, in which case great, or it can’t in which case the architectural costs are fairly low compared to the total cost of the building that it really makes no sense to cut corners there.
If you’re doing something bespoke, you’ll want something that works, and if the architecture firm you use is cheaper than other bespoke firms, but the final product is subpar, you’ll sue. Or at the very least not use them again.
Now this is a nitpick, but I think it might largely apply to the wider point: when you dig into the details it doesn’t really make sense.
The particular example given (architecture) doesn’t really make sense IMO:
If you’re building something and want to save money on architecture, the current solution is to take a boilerplate design, tweak it to the current plot and local building code, and build it. Either AI can do that tweaking well, in which case great, or it can’t in which case the architectural costs are fairly low compared to the total cost of the building that it really makes no sense to cut corners there.
If you’re doing something bespoke, you’ll want something that works, and if the architecture firm you use is cheaper than other bespoke firms, but the final product is subpar, you’ll sue. Or at the very least not use them again.
Now this is a nitpick, but I think it might largely apply to the wider point: when you dig into the details it doesn’t really make sense.