I did in fact consider this when nominating the post for review. Ultimately, I thought that a review, that perhaps points out the potential biases in the post, and also the places where it has merit, might actually improve the post with necessary context, and give a chance to separate some of the ideas that have merit from perceived biases of the author.
I do think that this is something that the mods will have to consider when deciding after a review whether to include this post. Both not including it even if they think it has good content, and including it even though they don’t support the actions of the author, would have implications for the values that they support.
I did in fact consider this when nominating the post for review. Ultimately, I thought that a review, that perhaps points out the potential biases in the post, and also the places where it has merit, might actually improve the post with necessary context, and give a chance to separate some of the ideas that have merit from perceived biases of the author.
I do think that this is something that the mods will have to consider when deciding after a review whether to include this post. Both not including it even if they think it has good content, and including it even though they don’t support the actions of the author, would have implications for the values that they support.