I didn’t downvote the post—it is thought-provoking, though I don’t agree with it.
But I had a negative reaction to the title (which seems borderline deliberately provocative to attract attention), and the disclaimer—as thomblake said, “Please write posts such that they can be interpreted literally, so the gist follows naturally from the literal reading.”
It is the disclaimer. I was rather annoyed at all the comments to my other post. People claimed things I to my understanding never said. And if what I said was analyzed I’m sure nobody could show me how to come to such conclusions. As was obvious, not even EY read my post but simply took something out of context and run with it.
I didn’t downvote the post—it is thought-provoking, though I don’t agree with it.
But I had a negative reaction to the title (which seems borderline deliberately provocative to attract attention), and the disclaimer—as thomblake said, “Please write posts such that they can be interpreted literally, so the gist follows naturally from the literal reading.”
It is the disclaimer. I was rather annoyed at all the comments to my other post. People claimed things I to my understanding never said. And if what I said was analyzed I’m sure nobody could show me how to come to such conclusions. As was obvious, not even EY read my post but simply took something out of context and run with it.