A case of thinking too deeply about the matter just leading a large fraction of people into confusion?
Confusion doesn’t explain the firm directionality of the trend.
(and possibly even have loyalties to particular rigid theories)
This doesn’t explain which one gets dominance, although it allows some amplification of noise or bias caused by other factors.
I think the “think explicitly about decision theory” part was supposed to indicate the direction, since CDT as been the leader.
Confusion doesn’t explain the firm directionality of the trend.
This doesn’t explain which one gets dominance, although it allows some amplification of noise or bias caused by other factors.
I think the “think explicitly about decision theory” part was supposed to indicate the direction, since CDT as been the leader.