Relativity works describing reality, so companies are making a killing using it to build accurate GPS devices. A bit more roundabout than some of the others, but doesn’t seem “wrong”.
But unlike all the others, if Relativity weren’t true, they’d still be able to do that. They’d just do it by not incorporating the predictions of Relativity.
If electricity worked by classical models, we wouldn’t be building semiconductor circuits differently, we wouldn’t be able to build them at all. All the others could be implemented for initiatives that would be possible if they were real, but impossible otherwise, so Relativity is the odd one out.
There are doubtless other models by which electricity could hypothetically work that would allow circuits that do interesting things. I don’t see where the focus on specific “classical models” is drawn from.
Relativity works describing reality, so companies are making a killing using it to build accurate GPS devices. A bit more roundabout than some of the others, but doesn’t seem “wrong”.
But unlike all the others, if Relativity weren’t true, they’d still be able to do that. They’d just do it by not incorporating the predictions of Relativity.
If electricity worked by classical models, we wouldn’t be building semiconductor circuits differently, we wouldn’t be able to build them at all. All the others could be implemented for initiatives that would be possible if they were real, but impossible otherwise, so Relativity is the odd one out.
There are doubtless other models by which electricity could hypothetically work that would allow circuits that do interesting things. I don’t see where the focus on specific “classical models” is drawn from.