That question presupposes a flawed way of thinking about making laws. Laws have many effects and shouldn’t be judged on the effect they have on a single case.
In addition most of us aren’t faced with consequential decisions about individual laws so it’s hot a stronlgy meaningful issue.
The issue of 2) Everybody should be vegan. is one that I listed as an example of a meaningful issue because it drives choices I make in my life. It’s meaningful because I can point to the effect it has on my life to think differently about the issue.
The questions that you posed don’t fall into that class.
That question presupposes a flawed way of thinking about making laws. Laws have many effects and shouldn’t be judged on the effect they have on a single case.
In addition most of us aren’t faced with consequential decisions about individual laws so it’s hot a stronlgy meaningful issue.
Just because you don’t have strong private incentives for public or group issues doesn’t make it not meaningful
It’s not about the incentives. It’s mostly that most people here don’t care about the issue enough to effect the legislative process.
What testable reason(s) do you have to believe that and would would change your mind about it?
The basic test would be to ask people what they actually would do differently when they would hold different beliefs.
what would you actually do differently when you hold different beliefs?
If I would believe that everybody should eat vegan I would eat a different diet.
I am so confused right now.
The issue of
2) Everybody should be vegan.is one that I listed as an example of a meaningful issue because it drives choices I make in my life. It’s meaningful because I can point to the effect it has on my life to think differently about the issue.The questions that you posed don’t fall into that class.