Uhm, the power differential between an aligned sovereign and humanity makes any autonomy humans have conditional on the sovereign’s goodwill.
I find they concept of a sovereign nanny unpleasant.
Aligned sovereigns in general belong more to theology than to technology. I’m not convinced it’s a consistent/coherent concept, let alone a realizable or desirable one.
And its will follows your will. The question dissolves.
Is it sovereign, if you it obeys your programming, which obligates it to empower and integrate you as soon as it can? Yes, no, it doesn’t matter.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Uhm, the power differential between an aligned sovereign and humanity makes any autonomy humans have conditional on the sovereign’s goodwill.
I find they concept of a sovereign nanny unpleasant.
Aligned sovereigns in general belong more to theology than to technology. I’m not convinced it’s a consistent/coherent concept, let alone a realizable or desirable one.
And its will follows your will. The question dissolves.
Is it sovereign, if you it obeys your programming, which obligates it to empower and integrate you as soon as it can? Yes, no, it doesn’t matter.