Suggest you remove the “Exercises / Problem-Sets” tag, unless the exercise is supposed to be one of down-voting that label …
Edited to add: MichaelA has now explained that he intended the exercise to be to answer the questions in the Anki cards. As a result of adding spoiler-blocks (some time after I made my comment), the “Exercises / Problem-Sets” tag is now somewhat reasonable in my opinion.
And any reader can indeed downvote any tag, so if you feel that that tag shouldn’t be there, you could just downvote it.
Unless you feel that the tag shouldn’t be there but aren’t very confident about that, and thus wanted to just gently suggest that maybe the tag should be removed—like putting in a 0.5 vote rather than a full one. But that doesn’t seem to match the tone of your comment.
That said, it actually does seem to me that this post fairly clearly does match the description for that tag; the exercise is using these Anki cards as Anki cards. People can find a link to download these cards in the Anki card file format here. (I’ve now added that link in the body of the post itself; I guess I should’ve earlier.)
---
As a meta comment: For what it’s worth, I feel like your comment had an unnecessarily snarky tone, at least to my eye. I think you could’ve either just downvoted the tag, or said the same thing in a way that sounds less snarky. That said:
It’s very possible (even probable?) that you didn’t intend to be snarky, and tht this is just a case of tone getting misread on the internet
And in any case, this didn’t personally bug me, partly because I’ve posted on LessWrong and the EA Forum a lot.
But I think if I was newer to the sites or to posting, this might leave a bad taste in my mouth and make me less inclined to post in future. (Again, I’m not at all trying to say this was your intent!)
(Edited to add: Btw, I wasn’t the person who downvoted your comment, so that appears to be slightly more evidence that your comment was at least liable to be interpreted as unnecessary and snarky—although again I know that that may not have been your intention.)
Suggest you remove the “Exercises / Problem-Sets” tag, unless the exercise is supposed to be one of down-voting that label …
Edited to add: MichaelA has now explained that he intended the exercise to be to answer the questions in the Anki cards. As a result of adding spoiler-blocks (some time after I made my comment), the “Exercises / Problem-Sets” tag is now somewhat reasonable in my opinion.
I didn’t add that tag; some other reader did.
And any reader can indeed downvote any tag, so if you feel that that tag shouldn’t be there, you could just downvote it.
Unless you feel that the tag shouldn’t be there but aren’t very confident about that, and thus wanted to just gently suggest that maybe the tag should be removed—like putting in a 0.5 vote rather than a full one. But that doesn’t seem to match the tone of your comment.
That said, it actually does seem to me that this post fairly clearly does match the description for that tag; the exercise is using these Anki cards as Anki cards. People can find a link to download these cards in the Anki card file format here. (I’ve now added that link in the body of the post itself; I guess I should’ve earlier.)
---
As a meta comment: For what it’s worth, I feel like your comment had an unnecessarily snarky tone, at least to my eye. I think you could’ve either just downvoted the tag, or said the same thing in a way that sounds less snarky. That said:
It’s very possible (even probable?) that you didn’t intend to be snarky, and tht this is just a case of tone getting misread on the internet
And in any case, this didn’t personally bug me, partly because I’ve posted on LessWrong and the EA Forum a lot.
But I think if I was newer to the sites or to posting, this might leave a bad taste in my mouth and make me less inclined to post in future. (Again, I’m not at all trying to say this was your intent!)
(Edited to add: Btw, I wasn’t the person who downvoted your comment, so that appears to be slightly more evidence that your comment was at least liable to be interpreted as unnecessary and snarky—although again I know that that may not have been your intention.)