Not an answer to your question, but a more general point:
If your question must have political examples, you are much more likely to foster good conversation if you can make your examples be from a variety of positions rather than all from the same one. It demonstrates that you’re not trying to score political points on an issue, shows that you can consider multiple sides of an issue, and avoids triggering a bunch of defensive comments from people who disagree with you. I’d recommend substituting an example like this one for one of yours:
‘So you say capitalism is horrible and must be destroyed—on the iPhone made by a corporation.’
Not an answer to your question, but a more general point:
If your question must have political examples, you are much more likely to foster good conversation if you can make your examples be from a variety of positions rather than all from the same one. It demonstrates that you’re not trying to score political points on an issue, shows that you can consider multiple sides of an issue, and avoids triggering a bunch of defensive comments from people who disagree with you. I’d recommend substituting an example like this one for one of yours:
‘So you say capitalism is horrible and must be destroyed—on the iPhone made by a corporation.’
Thanks Aphyer, I totally agree. I am replacing one of the examples with yours