Does this essay say anything substantive beyond “maximize expected value”?
That isn’t the point of the essay at all. It argues that over-caution can often be a bad strategy. I make a similar point in the context of superintelligence in my the risks of caution video.
Does this essay say anything substantive beyond “maximize expected value”?
That isn’t the point of the essay at all. It argues that over-caution can often be a bad strategy. I make a similar point in the context of superintelligence in my the risks of caution video.