Well there’s always value in cramming old ideas into a small amount of words.
You’re right that I should have aimed for something more interesting and novel, but I’m still experimenting with LessWrong and went with this for now. Thanks for the comment, I’ll keep this in mind for next time.
Whats the point of a very short overview of something that’s been already discussed at much greater length?
Well there’s always value in cramming old ideas into a small amount of words.
You’re right that I should have aimed for something more interesting and novel, but I’m still experimenting with LessWrong and went with this for now. Thanks for the comment, I’ll keep this in mind for next time.
I don’t think it counts as a FAQ article, because it’s inconclusive.