OK that makes sense, thanks. This is what I suspected, but I was surprised that so many people are saying that UDT gets mugged without stipulating this; it made it seem like I was missing something.
Playing devil’s advocate:
P(mugger) and P(anti-mugger) aren’t the only relevant quantities IRL
I don’t think we know nearly enough to have a good idea of what policy UDT would choose for a given prior. This leads me to doubt the usefulness of UDT.
OK that makes sense, thanks. This is what I suspected, but I was surprised that so many people are saying that UDT gets mugged without stipulating this; it made it seem like I was missing something.
Playing devil’s advocate:
P(mugger) and P(anti-mugger) aren’t the only relevant quantities IRL
I don’t think we know nearly enough to have a good idea of what policy UDT would choose for a given prior. This leads me to doubt the usefulness of UDT.