I can prove the property that for each hypothesis A()=a there is at most one u such that U()=u has a high valuation (for sufficiently high PA+N), with the following caveat: it can sometimes take many steps to prove that u≠u′ in PA+N, so we’ll need to include the length of that proof in our bound.
In what follows, we will take all subscripts of d and ν to be PA+N,A()=a for N large.
For any ϕ, d(⊥)−d(¬ϕ)≤d(ϕ)≤d(⊥) and thus 1−d(ϕ)d(⊥)≤ν(ϕ)≤d(⊥)d(ϕ)+d(⊥).
Also, d(U()=u)+d(U()=u′)+d(u≠u′)≥d(⊥). This implies max{d(U()=u),d(U()=u′)}≥12(d(⊥)−d(u≠u)), which implies min{ν(U()=u),ν(U()=u′)}≤min{d(⊥)d(U()=u)+d(⊥),d(⊥)d(U()=u′)+d(⊥)}≤2d(⊥)3d(⊥)−d(u≠u′).
So we see that ν(U()=u) and ν(U()=u′) cannot both be significantly larger than 2⁄3 if there is a short proof that u≠u′.
I can prove the property that for each hypothesis A()=a there is at most one u such that U()=u has a high valuation (for sufficiently high PA+N), with the following caveat: it can sometimes take many steps to prove that u≠u′ in PA+N, so we’ll need to include the length of that proof in our bound.
In what follows, we will take all subscripts of d and ν to be PA+N,A()=a for N large.
For any ϕ, d(⊥)−d(¬ϕ)≤d(ϕ)≤d(⊥) and thus 1−d(ϕ)d(⊥)≤ν(ϕ)≤d(⊥)d(ϕ)+d(⊥).
Also, d(U()=u)+d(U()=u′)+d(u≠u′)≥d(⊥). This implies max{d(U()=u),d(U()=u′)}≥12(d(⊥)−d(u≠u)), which implies min{ν(U()=u),ν(U()=u′)}≤min{d(⊥)d(U()=u)+d(⊥),d(⊥)d(U()=u′)+d(⊥)}≤2d(⊥)3d(⊥)−d(u≠u′).
So we see that ν(U()=u) and ν(U()=u′) cannot both be significantly larger than 2⁄3 if there is a short proof that u≠u′.