I don’t think most people living in other times & places privately agreed with their society’s public morality, to the same extent that we do today.
For most of history (not prehistory), there was no option for public debate or even for openly stating opinions. Morality was normally handed down from above, from the rulers, as part of a religion. If those people had an opportunity to live in our society and be acclimatized to it, many of them may have preferred our morality. I don’t believe the reverse is true, however.
This doesn’t prove that our morality is objectively better—it’s impossible to prove this, by definition—but it does dismiss the implication of the argument that “you like today’s morality because you live today”. Only the people who live today are likely to like their time’s morality.
This doesn’t prove that our morality is objectively better—it’s impossible to prove this, by definition—but it does dismiss the implication of the argument that “you like today’s morality because you live today”. Only the people who live today are likely to like their time’s morality.
Thanks, this is a good point—and of course there’s plenty to dislike about lots of morality to be found today, there’s reason to hope the people of tomorrow will overall like tomorrow’s morality even better. As you say, this doesn’t lead to objective morality, but it’s a happy thought.
I don’t think most people living in other times & places privately agreed with their society’s public morality, to the same extent that we do today.
For most of history (not prehistory), there was no option for public debate or even for openly stating opinions. Morality was normally handed down from above, from the rulers, as part of a religion. If those people had an opportunity to live in our society and be acclimatized to it, many of them may have preferred our morality. I don’t believe the reverse is true, however.
This doesn’t prove that our morality is objectively better—it’s impossible to prove this, by definition—but it does dismiss the implication of the argument that “you like today’s morality because you live today”. Only the people who live today are likely to like their time’s morality.
Thanks, this is a good point—and of course there’s plenty to dislike about lots of morality to be found today, there’s reason to hope the people of tomorrow will overall like tomorrow’s morality even better. As you say, this doesn’t lead to objective morality, but it’s a happy thought.
In the middle ages in Europe the middle class lived after much stricter morality than the ruling class when it comes to question such as having sex.
Morality was often the way of the powerless to feel like they are better than the ruling class.
I think that this is a compelling consideration. Whilst morality is subjective, whether someone’s preferences are satisfied is more objective.