I am new to LW, and I don’t get it; this is supposed to be a forum promoting rationality, and anyone who dissed this comment appears to be behaving re-actively.
Any rational justifications as to why anyone would respond to the above comment are welcomed, and may be appended below.
The problem is that you seem to be underestimating the relevant inferential distance. Specifically you’re using a lot of jargon in both this and the parent, and we have no idea what you’re talking about.
I am new to LW, and I don’t get it; this is supposed to be a forum promoting rationality, and anyone who dissed this comment appears to be behaving re-actively.
Any rational justifications as to why anyone would respond to the above comment are welcomed, and may be appended below.
It is rational to downvote comments you want to see fewer of, and your failed attempt at trolling certainly qualifies.
The problem is that you seem to be underestimating the relevant inferential distance. Specifically you’re using a lot of jargon in both this and the parent, and we have no idea what you’re talking about.