1) If women are generally willing to share men, how does it come about that the women are being “hogged” (which I understand to mean that they are partnered with only one man)?
2) Is #2 a special case of a general belief that family arrangements that are less stable than currently-legally-recognized families ought not be celebrated or recognized by law? Or does it just apply to this case?
Two questions.
1) If women are generally willing to share men, how does it come about that the women are being “hogged” (which I understand to mean that they are partnered with only one man)?
2) Is #2 a special case of a general belief that family arrangements that are less stable than currently-legally-recognized families ought not be celebrated or recognized by law? Or does it just apply to this case?
Women are willing to share a man, and the man is unwilling to share his women.
Ah, I see. (nods) That makes sense.