Model doesn’t match reality: false cause, slippery slope, gambler’s fallacy,
Updating on weak evidence: similarity/analogy, familiarity/anecdote,
Argument on the basis evidence / justification / criteria that have been screened off or are irrelevant: genetic fallacy, appeal to authority, bandwagon, natural ideal, ad hominem, appeal to consequences
Equivocation: false dichotomous partition, ambiguity, strawman, external burden of proof (my priors are their priors?), circular argument
Restructuring theory without adjusting prior: special pleading, no true Scotsman, Texas sharpshooter
Premature compromise.
Also, Ulrike Hahn has a few papers explaining fallacies or trying to make a stronger normative theory of argumentation. Might be a good place to start if you want a more in depth chart.
The first taxonomy that popped out at me:
Also, Ulrike Hahn has a few papers explaining fallacies or trying to make a stronger normative theory of argumentation. Might be a good place to start if you want a more in depth chart.