I don’t believe the true reason for the speech was to get McGonagall to agree with his actions—It was to assert his dominance over her.
Well, yes. I’m wondering what McGonagall’s reactions would have been in the counterfactual where he wasn’t working to establish authority over her.
I don’t believe the true reason for the speech was to get McGonagall to agree with his actions—It was to assert his dominance over her.
Well, yes. I’m wondering what McGonagall’s reactions would have been in the counterfactual where he wasn’t working to establish authority over her.