This post is short on actual information and long on shiny words.
What is the sharp distinction you are drawing between “logical deduction” and “empiricism”?
What are you actually putting in the game to support empiricism, and how, if there is no cost for failure, does it prohibit process-of-elimination?
The art you present looks like a typical modern platform or swimming level. What is notable about it?
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
This post is short on actual information and long on shiny words.
What is the sharp distinction you are drawing between “logical deduction” and “empiricism”?
What are you actually putting in the game to support empiricism, and how, if there is no cost for failure, does it prohibit process-of-elimination?
The art you present looks like a typical modern platform or swimming level. What is notable about it?