He wouldn’t be good at it, would he? His role is purely defensive—thwarting and removing evil wizards without croaking in the process. There’s little evidence he can plot that well, or lead a group that isn’t a smallish team of fawning younger Aurors.
His role is purely defensive—thwarting and removing evil wizards without croaking in the process.
He’s very offensive on the tactical level. If that sums up to defensiveness on the strategic level, that seems like it should tell us something about Dark Wizards being better strategists than the Light ones.
He wouldn’t be good at it, would he? His role is purely defensive—thwarting and removing evil wizards without croaking in the process. There’s little evidence he can plot that well, or lead a group that isn’t a smallish team of fawning younger Aurors.
He’s very offensive on the tactical level. If that sums up to defensiveness on the strategic level, that seems like it should tell us something about Dark Wizards being better strategists than the Light ones.
Well, duh. It’s easier to gain and keep power than to gain and keep power and also improve the world and never do anything too unethical.