Within years, the combo of ST_CASE and STATE uniquely identifies accidents, so an intermediate step is tracking the accident ID. Then you could classify accidents as involving a child as those where at least one of the decedents is under a certain age, then use that PER_TYP variable to look at the ages of the driver(s) for those accidents. Cool analysis, btw—I’ve worked a lot with the FARS and happy to help :)
While this doesn’t change the basic conclusion from the data, does the data provide any data related to:
adults also injured in the accidents for the children 5 and under?
Age of the driver of the vehicle?
1: while the data is supposed to include all traffic fatalities, it includes few injuries, and in recent data it only includes fatalities
2: I don’t see that in the data:
You can get the age of the driver by looking at the age of the person with PER_TYP equal to one.
I’m not that familiar with the data, but how would I link that record to a child death?
Within years, the combo of ST_CASE and STATE uniquely identifies accidents, so an intermediate step is tracking the accident ID. Then you could classify accidents as involving a child as those where at least one of the decedents is under a certain age, then use that PER_TYP variable to look at the ages of the driver(s) for those accidents. Cool analysis, btw—I’ve worked a lot with the FARS and happy to help :)