Your comments seem to me to increasingly be of the “gotcha” variety that focus on noncrucial details.
They’re necessary to the arguments being made, which are necessary to the generation of conclusions.
If pointing out errors in the arguments isn’t ‘relevant’ enough, what exactly would be?
They’re necessary to the arguments being made, which are necessary to the generation of conclusions.
If pointing out errors in the arguments isn’t ‘relevant’ enough, what exactly would be?