And one person needs to take responsibility for the meta-task of creating and leading the group.
Actually, the usual start for such things is not a single person, but a conversation. Sometimes you need one leader, sometimes a few “founders” work well, and occasionally even a committee (gasp!) suffices.
Actually, the usual start for such things is not a single person, but a conversation. Sometimes you need one leader, sometimes a few “founders” work well, and occasionally even a committee (gasp!) suffices.
Tyranny generally works faster than a democracy… Or oligarchy I guess in this case.
I don’t think “faster” is the overwhelming criterion in this case.