Yes, I think that’s what my point comes down to: so you like beer after being pressured by friends to drink it for five years. Then, by simple force of habit, you come to like it—your tastes change.
[...] But stop telling me beer tastes good.
I like the taste of a particular beer and came to that conclusion after having about 4 beers before it in my lifetime. Not 4 servings of that particular beer, but 4 servings total. I understand acquired taste and claim that this does not qualify for that label. I liked it. I though it tasted good.
I assume you are not saying, “beer always tastes bad for everyone until they get conditioned by society.” That is what it sounds like to me, however. Is beer just an example for the sake of convenience?
ETA: Similarly, Homer’s The Odyssey isn’t good. Rather, a bunch of people have a tradition of reading it that they pass on and get the next generation to perpetuate. But what the heck am I supposed to learn about good writing from that, other than:
Is it plausible that it is good? Or has that scenario been completely rejected from your worldview? I haven’t read it, personally, so I really have no idea if it is or isn’t.
I like the taste of a particular beer and came to that conclusion after having about 4 beers before it in my lifetime. Not 4 servings of that particular beer, but 4 servings total. I understand acquired taste and claim that this does not qualify for that label. I liked it. I though it tasted good.
I assume you are not saying, “beer always tastes bad for everyone until they get conditioned by society.” That is what it sounds like to me, however. Is beer just an example for the sake of convenience?
Is it plausible that it is good? Or has that scenario been completely rejected from your worldview? I haven’t read it, personally, so I really have no idea if it is or isn’t.