Disliking Pollock is irrational. As is disliking Cage. Or Joyce. Or PEZ.
I love 4′33″. It helps me get to sleep.
People can get the humor and still downvote you.
I didn’t vote one way or the other.
Edit: OMG! Is my humor too subtle people? PEZ!
It was, yes—maybe we need to make emoticons more normal here, since this is a recurring problem. :P
(Downvote removed)
maybe we need to make emoticons more normal here, since this is a recurring problem.
But then how will we signal our sophistication and mutually affirm our status as an intellectual subculture? ;)
Anime references. Duh.
:P~
;D
Neutral vote. I like the PEZ juxtaposition but ‘arational’ would fit better. A simply false assertion doesn’t fit well with the irony.
As it was mocking bgrah’s assertion, and bgrah used “unrational”, and in my estimation his meaning was closer to “irrational” than “arational”, I used the former. Perhaps using “unrational” would have been better, though.
Just consider it evidence of the level of culture you’ll find hereabouts. Savages.
Disliking Pollock is irrational. As is disliking Cage. Or Joyce. Or PEZ.
I love 4′33″. It helps me get to sleep.
People can get the humor and still downvote you.
I didn’t vote one way or the other.
It was, yes—maybe we need to make emoticons more normal here, since this is a recurring problem. :P
(Downvote removed)
But then how will we signal our sophistication and mutually affirm our status as an intellectual subculture? ;)
Anime references. Duh.
:P~
;D
Neutral vote. I like the PEZ juxtaposition but ‘arational’ would fit better. A simply false assertion doesn’t fit well with the irony.
As it was mocking bgrah’s assertion, and bgrah used “unrational”, and in my estimation his meaning was closer to “irrational” than “arational”, I used the former. Perhaps using “unrational” would have been better, though.
Just consider it evidence of the level of culture you’ll find hereabouts. Savages.