what matters is that there is crossover at some point
But there isn’t necessarily one. That’s the point—Eliezer is presuming that dust speck harm is additive and that enough of such harms will equal torture. This presumption does not seem to have a basis in rational argument.
But there isn’t necessarily one. That’s the point—Eliezer is presuming that dust speck harm is additive and that enough of such harms will equal torture. This presumption does not seem to have a basis in rational argument.